28 November 2013
(I'm afraid my son has taken the good camera to uni with him so for the foreseeable we'll have to do with grainy snapshots of our wildlife.)
When hanging out the washing today (I know it won't dry but it got me out of the house) I noticed the little birds are back.
Somewhere some sparrows were tweeting - god knows how they manage to carry those Iphones but they can't resist telling everyone what they've done: 'Had a worm for breakfast', 'Cat Klaxon!','#wheresthepeanuts', 'that washing won't dry LOL'.
A blackbird was being hysterical in a tree.
And what sounded like a whole flock of seagulls were swirling around, but really was a lone starling on a chimney practising his seagull impressions.
Birding experts say birds simply go quiet in late summer while they skulk about in the undergrowth during their annual molt. Personally I doubt that. Blackbirds can't resist having a good shout. Would they manage to calm down enough while they molt to keep their beaks still? And how would starlings learn to mimic seagulls if they didn't take a holiday by the sea?
And as for the sparrows I think we should hack into their instagram accounts to see where they've really been.
16 November 2013
Shinrin Yoku is a modern kind of nature cure. Japanese scientists are currently doing a lot of research on the benefits of walking in forests. Shinrin yoku translates into 'forest bathing'. Having attached various machines to people and analysed the change in blood pressure and brain activity they have concluded taking time to walk in woodlands is a good thing for your health.
The scientists say these health benefits are due to chemicals, called phytoncides, exuded by the trees. These are the chemicals contained by all plants used to protect themselves from infection, rotting and being eaten. Human bodies seem to interact with them to produce similar results (ie, they stop you rotting).
In the video below the lovely American reporter explains that science has to be employed to provide hard evidence for what most people intuitively already know because research is needed to convince town planners and the like that it is worth preserving and creating green spaces within the urban environment.
What a desperate barren world we live in when numbers have to be used to persuade the powerful that people need trees and sunlight and quiet joy.
Are phytoncides the woodland fairy folk our ancestors saw? Modern science boils down good feelings into chemicals that we cannot see. Perhaps those good feelings are just as well explained by spirits similarly invisible to the walker in the wood.
Let the trees be consulted before you take any action
every time you breathe in thank a tree
let tree roots crack parking lots at the world bank headquarters
let loggers be druids specially trained and rewarded
to sacrifice trees at auspicious times
let carpenters be master artisans
let lumber be treasured like gold
let chain saws be played like saxophones
let soldiers on maneuvers plant trees give police and criminals a shovel
and a thousand seedlings
let businessmen carry pocketfuls of acorns
let newlyweds honeymoon in the woods
walk don't drive
stop reading newspapers
stop writing poetry
squat under a tree and tell stories.
- John Wright
If you haven't already discovered her I urge you to look at the blog of Terri Wilding, 'Myth & Moor'. She has written a long series of posts about the mythic wood.
I came nose to leaf with a spurge today. During a tidying up session I found this dainty little plant bravely growing out of a crack in the decking.
Do you remember my encounter with spurge last summer when I mistook the poisonous spurge for an edible chickweed? What a hoot.
I have to confess though that I still don't know the difference between the two weeds. Like a dumb animal I simply learnt not to eat little weeds. So here, after some googling, is the definitive explanation:
- Chickweed has tiny, white star-like flowers, whereas spurge flowers are yellowy green
- Chickweed has hairs growing on its stalk, spurge is hairless
- Spurge has white sap, chickweed doesn't.
|Image from Flickr stream of Adam Grub 'Eat That Weed'|
So, if you too want to forage chickweed perhaps it would be best to wait until the plant is in flower and snap the stalk to see if it bleeds white sap. Got it.
On a different note, I want to put in a plea in defence of decking. We are always told that the worst thing you could do if you want to encourage wildlife into your garden is to put in decking. However, from my experience of being such a sinner I want to point out that yes, perhaps birds and bees aren't interested but there is still a lot of biological activity underneath and within the decking boards.
If you are not evangelical about cleanliness then weeds will grow, and moss, they in turn will attract those tiny little insect things that are at the bottom of the food chain.
Ecosystems, people, ecosystems!
Last year an absolutely huge fungus grew underneath the boards. It was spongey and orange and a bit Doctor Who-y in its worrying proportions. In contrast during the hot weather of summer spiders and beetles love the warmth of the wood. Even That Cat likes lounging on it, and That Cat is definitely 'wildlife'.
So I say don't be ashamed of your decking.
The odd chameleon can also turn up. ;-)
Adam Grub's image
14 November 2013
Manchester Museum will soon open a major exhibition, 'Coral: Something Rich and Strange'
It looks like someone has had a good thinking session and come up with a long list of objects associated with coral, then put a call out to other Manchester institutions to see if they have them.
There will be 'natural coral specimens, fossils and glass models of sea anemones with ethnographic objects, cultural artefacts, decorative art objects and artworks from different cultures around the globe. The cross-disciplinary display relies on objects from most of the Museum’s own departments – Zoology, Archaeology, Egyptology, Numismatics and Anthropology – but also draws on major loans from the Whitworth Art Gallery and Manchester Art Gallery. For example, Marion 'unearthed' a large collection of Victorian coral jewellery at the Gallery of Costume at Platt Hall, parts of which will be on display alongside Dante Gabriel Rossetti’s Pre-Raphaelite painting Joli Cœur, among other works.'
Wow, with all that stuff on display you're bound to learn something.
And the sainted Michael Wood will be giving a speech on the opening night.
I'm guessing the impulse to mount such an extensive exhibition is the plight of living coral reefs today. The combination of climate warming, ocean acidification, sedimentation and physical damage mean reefs are an endangered phenomenon.
But on the bright side the museum has a public engagement remit which means I get to do something fun and educational at the same time.
Now, this is going to be difficult to explain so please bear with me ...
one day a super clever mathematician was idly crocheting when she suddenly realised crochet would be the perfect medium to demonstrate hyperbolic space to her students.
I know! What's hyperbolic space? I watched this TED talk and I'm still not sure:
Luckily, you don't have to grasp the significance of the maths to have a go at hyperbolic crochet. You can just pick up the hook and do rows and rows of stitches. The curling shapes are the result of increasing every few stitches ie. every 3rd or 4th stitch. Or as the mathematicians put it, every n=3. This regular increasing gradually produces an exaggeratedly curved shape.
So what has this got to do with coral? Well, as you see coral like forms emerge from all those straight lines of hooking.
And if you ask the public to let their imaginations run riot with this magical result and then collect the weird and wonderful shapes in a natural history exhibition room you end up with a challengingly colourful artificial coral reef.
These then are a perfect way of educating the public about coral and mathematics. All in one go.
Of course, I'm not sure if this is really the case. We are not going to become mathematicians or defenders of the reefs by creating or seeing a mound of incredibly ugly textile art, but then again there may be a more subtle benefit.
Personally, by watching organic shapes emerge from my fingers as I mechanically counted stitches, I came to appreciate the structure and organisation underlying the seeming randomness of nature. Food for thought.
And the woman who first had the idea of crocheted reefs, Margaret Wertheim, has come to another understanding:
Wertheim says it would be hubristic to claim that her project alone could make people care about endangered reefs. Yet the last three years have brightened her outlook.
"A reef is made up of billions of coral polyps," she says. "Each one of these is completely insignificant individually, but collectively, they make up something as magnificent as the Great Barrier Reef. We humans, when we work together, can do amazing things."
10 November 2013
Inspired by blogger Allie Brosh I've spent all afternoon fighting with PhotoShop to produce these two gloriously amateurish cartoons (apologies to the artists and illustrators I know).
Allie draws fantastic cartoon stories about life and how maddening things can be.
She's really funny about her dogs. For example see the post 'Dog'
But I think she is a genius when talking about depression. She has got it absolutely right with this post .
|Tee hee. Been here!|
I wish I could turn Garden65 into something more useful and emotionally engaging. I'm afraid you're just stuck with my tedious taxonomy lessons.
7 November 2013
5 November 2013
If you are a gardener you have to deal with the passage of time.
Mostly it is experienced as a positive force as you see seedlings germinate and shrubs fill bald gaps in borders. Other times it forces us to make sad decisions - unfortunately Garden65 has had to lose two trees. One was a spruce that had finally reached the overhead telephone lines, and the other was a silver birch that was flirting with a neighbour's satellite dish. They were lovely characterful trees but the worry that we might get sued by angry telephone or Sky users meant they had to go.
On the plus side it's given us the opportunity to learn something about tree rings. Whoopee.
If you count the rings of the spruce tree it looks like it was 11 years old. Which means it originally germinated in 2002.
Below is a picture of the front garden in 2004 when I think I first planted it. Goodness, how small all the plants are. It's a jungle out there now. Perhaps they should all be lopped down.
So, let's whip through tree rings ...
A yearly ring is made of two distinct rings. A large, pale one, called the earlywood, grew in the spring and early summer when growing conditions were good. As growth slowed and less nutrients reached the plant cells a dark, dense ring formed called the latewood.
Over time, as the rings accumulate, the inner ones become less biologically active and turn into what is called the heartwood. The outer rings that still take part in the growth of the tree are called the sapwood.
The heartwood appears as a dark inner area, but I don't think you can see that in my tree. I wonder if that's because it is still young and all its wood is sapwood, or perhaps being a softwood tree it doesn't develop a heartwood.
Whatever the answer it just shows Nature doesn't always do what Wikipedia says it should.
The part of the tree we would call the wood, made of the heartwood and sapwood, is more scientifically termed the xylem. It seems all vascular plants have an inner xylem. This is the part of the plant that transports water and nutrients upwards to the leaves and flowers etc.
The sugars made by photosynthesis in the leaves is transported downwards by the phloem. In trees, the phloem is the innermost layer of the bark.
So, let's get this clear:
xylem = water + nutrients = upwards
phloem = sugar = downwards
|Closer look at the cambrium|
Back to the tree as a whole - a tree grows in two directions: outwards in the form of leaves, twigs and root tips, and inwards (or rather outwards) as its xylem increases inside the tree trunk.
Just inside the bark is an area called the cambrium where nonspecialist cells develop into either bark-side outer phloem cells or inner woody xylem cells. It is this inner growing of xylem cells that expands the trunk outwards.
Which, if you strip away all the scientific names, I think is a beautiful outcome of the magical dance between space and time.
As a random addendum to this musing on time and science and wonder here is Brian Cox in 'Wonders of Life'. What do you think?
"Go outside, now, and look at any randomly selected piece of your world. It could be a scruffy corner of your garden, or even a clump of grass forcing its way through a concrete pavement. It is unique. Encoded deep in the biology of every cell in every blade of grass, in every insect’s wing, in every bacterium cell, is the history of the third planet from the Sun in a Solar System making its way lethargically around a galaxy called the Milky Way. Its shape, form, function, color, smell, taste, molecular structure, arrangement of atoms, sequence of bases, and possibilities for a future are all absolutely unique. There is nowhere else in the observable Universe where you will see precisely that little clump of emergent, living complexity. It is wonderful. And the reason that thought occurred to me is not because some guru told me that the world is wonderful. It is because Darwin, and generations of scientists before and after, have shown it to be."
2 November 2013
"The details are too depressing to go into, so I won't, but what I do want to do is highlight the report's conclusions and recommendations ... in that there aren't any."I said that. It was in a post about the RSPBs recent report, State of Nature. Their headline findings were that 60% of wildlife populations have declined since 1968.
How depressing. I read it because I'm interested in that kind of thing, but I finished it saddened. Significantly, on finishing reading it I didn't immediately go out into the garden to put up bird boxes, create a log pile, sign a petition or join a conservation group. The report didn't encourage or empower me to think I could help reverse this decline in wildlife.
And in this I'm normal. Studies show that a constant doom and gloom reporting of the natural world doesn't motivate people to engage with it. Sadness, fear and even guilt wont push the normal person - Jane Average - into action. And yet this is tone of most of the communications conservation groups and the general media have when talking to the general public.
I've long said Green groups, of all hues, should employ artists if they want people to help save the planet, or local vole populations, or put their spent batteries in recycling bins.
People are motivated by emotion, not facts.
The dear old government has got a problem on its hands:
The Biodiversity Segmentation Scoping Study was commissioned to support delivery of Outcome 4 of the Biodiversity 2020 strategy: “By 2020, significantly more people will be engaged in biodiversity issues, aware of its value and taking positive action.”They seem to have agreed to flag up biodiversity as an issue their citizens should be concerned about, and one they could actively do something about.
Hmm, how are they going to do that? Do you think they have started yet? What is biodiversity anyway?
The Segmentation Scoping Study [oh, how we do like words here in Garden65] has produced a 121 page report. I've tried to get through it. I got to page 35 then had to have a reviving cup of tea. Which is a shame because the general drift of what it is saying is interesting.
Given the complexity of human psychology and the equally muddy nature of the society we live in the report suggests reframing biodiversity into a positive, personally important issue, instead of presenting the public with bland facts and/or scare stories about the loss of biodiversity.
As an example they mention the concept of 'global warming'. People have difficulty relating to the idea because:
"it does not fit with our everyday experiences, and it actually sounds rather pleasant. It is to be hoped that the recent reframing of climate change in terms of ‘global weirding’ will be much more successful on both counts."
Global weirding. Brilliant!
A communications agency [what's a communications agency?] called Futerra has produced a much easier to read little report on this idea of reframing or rebranding. I really recommend you have a look at it (only 15 pages long with nice pictures of penguins):
Their recommendation to those people trying to communicate green issues to the public is, 'Love Not Loss'. Messages that talk of loss, decline, threat are not motivating messages. They are counter-productive in that they induce apathy and a sense of powerlessness. On the other hand messages that engage awe and a reminder of the emotional connection people have with nature, ie. love, are the most successful.
They go on to say facts and economic realities are valuable tools of persuasion (to engage with biodiversity issues) but tend to be more useful to businesses and politicians rather than our Average Jane.
So if the big guns of Westminster and hipster trendies both agree depressing 'we're all doomed' reports are not inspiring people to take some action to help nature, then I feel not only entirely vindicated in my belief eco-people should use artists to get their messages across, but also possibly a nano-second ahead of the zeitgeist.